Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993611›Full record

SynthesisBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2021

Impact of Intestinal Urinary Diversion on the Risk of Fracture and Loss of Bone Mass: A Systematic Review.

Carmen Pozo, Benjamin Pradere, Katharina Rebhan, Cao Chao, Lin Yang, Mohammad Abufaraj, Shahrokh F Shariat

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carmen PozoDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin PradereDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina RebhanDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cao ChaoProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Lin YangDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mohammad AbufarajDepartment of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients undergoing intestinal urinary diversion (IUD) may have a higher risk of osteoporosis and risk of fractures due to metabolic acidosis and decrease of intestinal absorption surface.

objectiveWe performed a systematic review of the available literature on the impact of IUD on bone demineralization.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed

resultsOur electronic search identified a total of 2417 articles. After a detailed review, we selected 11 studies that addressed the impact of IUD on bone health in 10369 patients. The risk of bone fracture was studied in 3 articles, showing a higher risk in the IUD population. Of the 9 articles evaluating the relation between intestinal urinary diversion and bone density, 5 did find a positive association. One article evaluated the bone metabolism at a cellular level after IUD showing a decrease in bone turnover in this population. Three of the eight studies reporting data on serum parameters related to calcium and phosphate metabolism showed differences. Finally, a correlation between concentration of pyridolines in urine and loss of bone density was found in two of the three studies.

conclusionsAlthough published data on BMD are contradictory, patients undergoing IUD seem to be at higher risk of bone fractures. Our finding support the need to implement accessible strategies on osteoporosis screening and prevention in IUD patients.

Indexed as

acidosisbone fracturecystectomymetabolic diseasesosteoporosisUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsurinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID38993611
PMCPMC11181699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.