ArticleCureus2024
Student Satisfaction and Physical Health Effects of Online Learning Among Medical and Paramedical Undergraduates in Northern India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnline modality of pedagogy was introduced in many medical institutes globally, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, these techniques were not evaluated, either with respect to effectiveness or student satisfaction in terms of promoting successful educational outcomes. The current study was conducted to identify determinants of student satisfaction with respect to online learning, in the post-pandemic era.
methodsA pilot-tested and validated online questionnaire was administered to 370 medical/paramedical students who attended online classes during the pandemic. The students were selected randomly from four different streams of a medical university, representing all the years of study. The questionnaire included Likert-type questions and was divided into two parts: socio-demographic profile and satisfaction with online learning.
resultsThe response rate was 81.4%. Overall satisfaction with online learning among students was 35.9% and the areas of most satisfaction for students were user-friendliness of the online portal (65.5%), self-directed responsibilities assigned to pupils (49.9%), faculty accessibility/availability (48.8%) and timely evaluation, test and feedback (47.9%). The areas of most dissatisfaction were lack of personal effect as compared to offline learning (n=71, 23.6%), effect on social life (n=54, 17.9%), and feeling of not belonging to the online session (n=38, 12.6%). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that having previous exposure to online courses and having a separate room led to more satisfaction, whereas the emergence of health problems led to poor satisfaction with the course. The duration of previous exposure to online courses was not a statistically significant predictor of satisfaction. One or more health problems were reported by 176 (58.5%) of the respondents. Some of the common health problems reported were eye strain (72.8%), headache (56.1%), insomnia (47.2%), stress (35.2%), muscle fatigue (22.6) and tingling sensation (10.6%).
conclusionAdopting a combination of online and offline approaches, i.e., blended pedagogy, involving different methods to involve students and their feedback are important to ensure student satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.