ArticleCureus2024
Dysphagia After Partial Horizontal Supracricoid Laryngectomy: A Close Look.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Partial horizontal supracricoid laryngectomy (SCPL) with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) is a conservative surgical alternative for laryngeal cancer in the glottic or supraglottic region. Dysphagia and aspiration are frequently reported consequences of this surgery. We describe the case of a 72-year-old male patient diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (T2N0M0), who underwent SCPL with CHEP reconstruction. The patient was initially fed through a nasogastric tube post-surgery, later replaced by a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Swallowing evaluations were periodically conducted in collaboration with a speech therapist using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). In FEES assessments, the patient consistently presented with laryngeal penetration and possible tracheal aspiration. These findings were confirmed by VFSS. Additionally, a narrowing of the initial segment of the cervical esophagus was observed, caused by a large osteophyte in the anterior region of the C5 vertebral body, compromising the passage of the bolus, and leading to its accumulation above the upper esophageal sphincter and subsequent entry into the airway. Rehabilitation exercises for swallowing were recommended, maintaining an exclusive PEG diet. Three months after rehabilitation, a follow-up VFSS revealed that, for pasty consistency, the accumulation of the bolus above the cervical osteophyte was resolved with multiple swallows, without evidence of penetration or aspiration. Thus, it was possible to introduce oral intake of pasty consistency. Considering the anatomical and physiological complexity of swallowing, along with patient-specific characteristics, predicting the rehabilitation time for reconstructive laryngeal surgery is challenging. This case emphasizes the importance of a collaborative evaluation involving otorhinolaryngologists, speech therapists, and radiologists in studying dysphagia in patients undergoing conservative laryngeal surgeries to adapt and personalize rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.