ArticleCureus2024
A Comparison of Obstetric Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome Among Pregnant Women With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the maternal and perinatal outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Methods This retrospective case-control study was conducted among pregnant women with SLE with and without APS. Group A included SLE patients with APS, whereas group B included pregnant SLE women without APS. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Frequency and percentage were computed for categorical data. The chi-square test was used to analyze the difference between categorical data. Results Out of 125 cases of SLE, APS was found in 72 (57.6%) women. Almost 95.8% of patients were on treatment (aspirin and enoxaparin) in group A. Preterm delivery (31.89±7.36 versus 34.46±4.97; p=0.021) and termination of pregnancy (18.1% [13/72] versus 5.7% [3/53]; p=0.04) were statistically significant in group A. Among these terminations, second-trimester intrauterine death is found to be more in group A (SLE with APS) (16.7% [12/72]) as compared to group B (SLE without APS) (5.7% [3/53]) with a p-value of 0.05. Perinatal outcomes including NICU admissions (39% [23/59] versus 24% [12/50]; p=0.071) and neonatal death (12.3% [7/57]; p=0.015) were also found to be statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion APS with SLE is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth, termination of pregnancy due to second-trimester fetal loss, more NICU admission, and neonatal deaths when compared to the control group. Hence, pregnancies with APS with SLE require vigilant monitoring and frequent follow-ups to ensure a positive pregnancy outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.