ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2024
Effective manual cleaning as the first step of reprocessing glass probes of a medical device for non-invasive physical plasma therapy.
Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For reusable devices and device components, effective reprocessing is essential to prevent nosocomial infections. Aim: The objective of the study was to evaluate manual cleaning as the first step of reprocessing reusable glass probes of a device for generation of non-invasive physical plasma, in accordance with regulations. Methods: Two glass probes of the device were contaminated with human blood. For manual cleaning, both probes were cleaned with instrument cleaning agent and instrument brushes. Cleaning efficacy was evaluated by total protein measurement in the rinsing solution. Results: After manual cleaning of the two test glass probes, no protein from the test contamination with human blood could be detected. Neither the different design of the two probes nor the use of a hard or a soft instrument brush demonstrated any difference. Conclusion: Our data suggest that manual cleaning of glass probes achieves complete removal of organic contaminants. This should enable safe applications in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.