Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38993351›Full record

ArticleJCOM, Journal of science communication2024

Using science communication research to practice iterative engagement in collaborative nutrient management.

Katherine Canfield, Casey Chatelain

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JCOM, Journal of science communication, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine CanfieldEnvironmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development in the Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division in Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA. They are a qualitative social scientist by training, focused on applied research to improve stakeholder communication and engagement in water quality research. In the past her work has focused on inclusive science communication and justice in tourism development.
Casey ChatelainEnvironmental Scientist at Horsley Witten Group in Sandwich, Massachusetts. After graduating from College of the Holy Cross with a BA in Environmental Studies, she moved to Cotuit full time to work for Barnstable Land Trust. A lifelong sailor and a former commodore of the Cotuit Mosquito Yacht Club, Casey's love for the water (especially Cotuit Bay) drove her to get a Masters of Oceanography from the University of Rhode Island.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoughtful science communication is essential for the success of collaborative, transdisciplinary environmental research. We present an innovative evaluation of a four-year pilot project that took a highly engaged and collaborative approach to managing excess nutrients in the Cape Cod region of Massachusetts, USA. The evaluation approach included mid- and end-of-project interviews with researchers and project partners and a reflection from the lead science communication researcher. We found that an effective science communication evaluation needs to be (1) adaptive, (2) multistage, (3) holistic and objective-based, and (4) democratic and reflexive. Results demonstrate that formative and end-of-project science communication evaluation of research projects lead to improved engagement that better meets all collaborators' needs.

Indexed as

Environmental communicationPublic engagement with science and technologyPublic perception of science and technology

Identifiers

PMID38993351
PMCPMC11235194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.