ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2024
Microarray Images Contrast Enhancement and Gridding Using Genetic Algorithm.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microarray is a sophisticated tool that concurrently analyzes the expression levels of thousands of genes, giving scientists an overview of DNA and RNA study. This procedure is divided into three stages: contact with biological samples, data extraction, and data analysis. Because expression levels are disclosed by the interplay of light with fluorescent markers, the data extraction stage relies on image processing methods. To extract quantitative information from the microarray image (MAI), four steps of preprocessing, gridding, segmentation, and intensity quantification are required. During the generation of MAIs, a large number of error-prone processes occur, leading to structural problems and reduced quality in the resulting data, affecting the identification of expressed genes. Methods: In this article, the first stage has been examined. In the preprocessing stage, the contrast of the images is first enhanced using the genetic algorithm, then the source noises that appear as small artifacts are removed using morphology, and finally, to confirm the effect of the contrast enhancement (CE) on the main stages of microarray data processing, gridding is checked on complementary deoxyribonucleic acid MAIs. Results: The comparison of the obtained results with an adaptive histogram equalization (AHE) and multi-decomposition histogram equalization (M-DHE) methods shows the superiority and efficiency of the proposed method. For example, the image contrast of the Genomic Medicine Research Center Laboratory dataset is 3.24, which is 42.91 with the proposed method and 13.48 and 32.40 with the AHE and M-DHE methods, respectively. Conclusions: The performance of the proposed methods for CE is evaluated on 3 databases and a general conclusion is obtained as to which CE method is more suitable for each dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.