Observational studyCancer science2024
Uveal melanoma distant metastasis prediction system: A retrospective observational study based on machine learning.
Observational study in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Percutaneous Locoregional Therapies for the Treatment of Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma: A Systematic Review.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Prediction of progression of hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Melanoma research · 2026Article
- Review
- Development of a Machine Learning Model for Distant Metastasis Risk Stratification in Acral Melanoma.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Uveal melanoma survival prediction system: a multi-center database study.International ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Prognostic value of BAP1 expression in uveal melanoma: a comparative study with histopathological factors in a large Spanish cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-radiomics-SUVmax integration fromFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A TabPFN-based prediction system for refractive error and dry eye comorbidity: a retrospective study using large-scale real-world data.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Real-world database evaluation of drug-associated vitreous opacities and machine learning for clinical interpretability.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Editorial: Frontier research on artificial intelligence and radiomics in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Uveal melanoma distant metastasis prediction system: A retrospective observational study based on machine learning.Cancer science · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) patients face a significant risk of distant metastasis, closely tied to a poor prognosis. Despite this, there is a dearth of research utilizing big data to predict UM distant metastasis. This study leveraged machine learning methods on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to forecast the risk probability of distant metastasis. Therefore, the information on UM patients from the SEER database (2000-2020) was split into a 7:3 ratio training set and an internal test set based on distant metastasis presence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses assessed distant metastasis risk factors. Six machine learning methods constructed a predictive model post-feature variable selection. The model evaluation identified the multilayer perceptron (MLP) as optimal. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) interpreted the chosen model. A web-based calculator personalized risk probabilities for UM patients. The results show that nine feature variables contributed to the machine learning model. The MLP model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (Precision = 0.788; ROC AUC = 0.876; PR AUC = 0.788). Grade recode, age, primary site, time from diagnosis to treatment initiation, and total number of malignant tumors were identified as distant metastasis risk factors. Diagnostic method, laterality, rural-urban continuum code, and radiation recode emerged as protective factors. The developed web calculator utilizes the MLP model for personalized risk assessments. In conclusion, the MLP machine learning model emerges as the optimal tool for predicting distant metastasis in UM patients. This model facilitates personalized risk assessments, empowering early and tailored treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.