ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2024
Effects of Various Concentrations of Pronase on Flow Cytometric Crossmatching Patients Treated With Rituximab and Donor HLA-Specific Antibodies.
Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- IgG Subclass Profiles of HLA Antibodies Enhance Prediction of C1q-Binding in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Therapeutic biologics interference in serological and pre-transfusion testing.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pronase pretreatment can reduce rituximab (RTX) interference by degrading CD20 in B-cell flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) testing. However, it may also reduce the assay sensitivity by degrading HLA molecules. We investigated the effects of various pronase concentrations on RTX interference and the analytical sensitivity of B-cell FCXM testing. Methods: Using 59 patient serum samples and 38 donor lymphocyte samples, we designed 97 recipient-donor pairs and divided them into three groups according to RTX use and the presence of weak-to-moderate donor HLA-specific antibody (DSA) reactions: RTX+/DSA-, RTX+/DSA+, and RTX-/DSA+. FCXM was performed after pretreating lymphocytes with six different pronase concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mg/mL). Results: With B-FCXM testing, false-positive results due to RTX in the RTX+/DSA- group markedly decreased with increasing pronase concentrations. The median channel shift values in the RTX+/DSA+ and RTX-/DSA+ groups did not significantly decrease when the pronase concentration was increased from 1 mg/mL to 2 or 3 mg/mL. All eight RTX+/DSA+ cases that were positive at 1 mg/mL pronase but negative at 2 or 3 mg/mL had mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) DSA values of less than 3,000 except for DQ5 (MFI: 5,226). With T-cell FCXM, false-positive results were observed in 2.9% of 315 FCXM tests with pronase pretreatment. Conclusions: Higher concentrations (2 or 3 mg/mL) of pronase effectively eliminated RTX interference but still carried a risk for false negativity for weak DSA reactions in B-cell FCXM. Higher pronase concentrations can be used as an auxiliary method to detect moderate-to-strong DSA reactions in RTX-treated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.