ArticleCancer science2024
Metabolism score and machine learning models for the prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression.
Article in Cancer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a metabolic-inflammatory-nutritional prognostic model for esophageal squamous carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning integrating intra-/peritumoral CT radiomics and serum indicators for predicting poorly differentiated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Metabolism score and machine learning models for the prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression.Cancer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incomplete prediction of prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients is attributed to various therapeutic interventions and complex prognostic factors. Consequently, there is a pressing demand for enhanced predictive biomarkers that can facilitate clinical management and treatment decisions. This study recruited 491 ESCC patients who underwent surgical treatment at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. We incorporated 14 blood metabolic indicators and identified independent prognostic indicators for overall survival through univariate and multivariate analyses. Subsequently, a metabolism score formula was established based on the biochemical markers. We constructed a nomogram and machine learning models utilizing the metabolism score and clinically significant prognostic features, followed by an evaluation of their predictive accuracy and performance. We identified alkaline phosphatase, free fatty acids, homocysteine, lactate dehydrogenase, and triglycerides as independent prognostic indicators for ESCC. Subsequently, based on these five indicators, we established a metabolism score that serves as an independent prognostic factor in ESCC patients. By utilizing this metabolism score in conjunction with clinical features, a nomogram can precisely predict the prognosis of ESCC patients, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89. The random forest (RF) model showed superior predictive ability (AUC = 0.90, accuracy = 86%, Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.55). Finally, we used an RF model with optimal performance to establish an online predictive tool. The metabolism score developed in this study serves as an independent prognostic indicator for ESCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.