ArticleEnvironmental research2024
Associations of serum persistent organic pollutant concentrations with incident diabetes in midlife women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation Multi-Pollutant Study.
Article in Environmental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolism-disrupting compounds and metabolic health during the menopausal transition: a narrative review.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Review
- Pesticides associated with incident diabetes among licensed private pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study cohort (1993-2021).Environment international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrganochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that can negatively impact metabolic health through pathways including endocrine disruption. Few studies have evaluated diabetes risk associated with PBDEs. Little is known about the joint effect of exposure to POP mixtures on diabetes risk.
objectivesWe investigated the relationship between POPs, individually and as mixtures, and diabetes development over 18 years (1999-2016) in midlife women.
methodsWe measured lipid-standardized serum concentrations of 34 PCBs, 19 OCPs, and 14 PBDEs in 1040 midlife women aged 45-56 years from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. We tested the association between POPs measured in 1999/2000 and incident diabetes using Cox proportional hazards models. We evaluated diabetes risk associated with the overall POP mixture using Quantile-Based G-Computation (QBGC).
resultsFor most mixture components, single pollutant and mixtures analyses indicated null associations with diabetes risk, however results were inconsistent. After adjustment, hazard ratios (HRs) of developing diabetes (95% CI) associated with upper exposure tertiles (T2/T3) compared with the first tertile (T1), were 1.7 (1.0, 2.8) at T2 and 1.5 (0.84, 2.7) at T3 for hexachlorobenzene and 1.9 (1.1, 3.3) at T2 and 1.6 (0.88, 2.9) at T3 for PCB 123. A doubling of PBDE 47 was associated with 1.11 (1.00, 1.24) times the risk of T2D. QBGC identified no association for the overall joint effect of the POP mixture on diabetes (HR = 1.04 [0.53, 2.07]).
conclusionExposure to a mixture of PCBs, OCPs, and PBDEs was not associated with incident diabetes in midlife U.S. women, although some individual POPs demonstrated significant yet inconsistent associations with diabetes. Non-linear and non-monotonic dose-response dynamics deserve further exploration. More research is needed on the diabetogenic effects of PBDEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.