Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992748›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2024

Genetic constraint at single amino acid resolution in protein domains improves missense variant prioritisation and gene discovery.

Xiaolei Zhang, Pantazis I Theotokis, Nicholas Li, SHaRe Investigators, Caroline F Wright, Kaitlin E Samocha, Nicola Whiffin, James S Ware

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Unified meta regression models for rare variant association studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Estimating clinical risk in gene regions from population sequencing cohort data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaolei ZhangNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. xiaolei@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-2719
Pantazis I TheotokisNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas LiNational Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
SHaRe Investigators
Caroline F WrightDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK.
Kaitlin E SamochaCenter for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicola Whiffin *Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. nwhiffin@well.ox.ac.uk.
James S Ware *National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. j.ware@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council RE/18/4/34215Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust 21JTAWellcome Trust 107469/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 200990/A/16/ZWellcome Trust 220134/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the major hurdles in clinical genetics is interpreting the clinical consequences associated with germline missense variants in humans. Recent significant advances have leveraged natural variation observed in large-scale human populations to uncover genes or genomic regions that show a depletion of natural variation, indicative of selection pressure. We refer to this as "genetic constraint". Although existing genetic constraint metrics have been demonstrated to be successful in prioritising genes or genomic regions associated with diseases, their spatial resolution is limited in distinguishing pathogenic variants from benign variants within genes.

methodsWe aim to identify missense variants that are significantly depleted in the general human population. Given the size of currently available human populations with exome or genome sequencing data, it is not possible to directly detect depletion of individual missense variants, since the average expected number of observations of a variant at most positions is less than one. We instead focus on protein domains, grouping homologous variants with similar functional impacts to examine the depletion of natural variations within these comparable sets. To accomplish this, we develop the Homologous Missense Constraint (HMC) score. We utilise the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) 125 K exome sequencing data and evaluate genetic constraint at quasi amino-acid resolution by combining signals across protein homologues.

resultsWe identify one million possible missense variants under strong negative selection within protein domains. Though our approach annotates only protein domains, it nonetheless allows us to assess 22% of the exome confidently. It precisely distinguishes pathogenic variants from benign variants for both early-onset and adult-onset disorders. It outperforms existing constraint metrics and pathogenicity meta-predictors in prioritising de novo mutations from probands with developmental disorders (DD). It is also methodologically independent of these, adding power to predict variant pathogenicity when used in combination. We demonstrate utility for gene discovery by identifying seven genes newly significantly associated with DD that could act through an altered-function mechanism.

conclusionsGrouping variants of comparable functional impacts is effective in evaluating their genetic constraint. HMC is a novel and accurate predictor of missense consequence for improved variant interpretation.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansProtein DomainsClinical interpretationDevelopmental disordersGenetic constraintMissense variant interpretationProtein domains

Identifiers

PMID38992748
PMCPMC11238507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.