ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in high risk salivary gland cancer.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Management of Malignancies of the Parotid Gland: A State-of-the-Art Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Prevalence of late xerostomia and hyposalivation with associated risk factors in survivors of head and neck cancer after radiotherapy: a multi-centric cross-sectional study.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the potential survival benefits associated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as opposed to radiotherapy (RT) in patients with resected high-risk salivary gland cancer (SGC), with a specific focus on determining whether these benefits are influenced by the number of high-risk variables.
methodsPatients who underwent surgical treatment for high-risk SGC were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into either CRT or RT groups. The impact of adjuvant therapy on locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using a multivariable Cox model.
resultsA total of 152 patients were included following propensity score-matching. In comparison to RT, CRT did not demonstrate a significant survival advantage in terms of LRC (p = 0.485, HR: 1.14, 95%CI: 0.36-4.22) and OS (p = 0.367, HR: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.17-3.87) in entire population. But among patients with T3/4 stage, high-grade tumors, and 5 or more positive lymph nodes, the addition of chemotherapy to RT significantly (p = 0.042) correlated with a 15% reduction in the risk of cancer recurrence (95%CI: 4-54%). Conversely, in other subgroups with varying combinations of high-risk variables, CRT did not provide additional survival benefits for LRC and OS compared to RT.
conclusionAdjuvant chemotherapy may be considered in conjunction with RT specifically in cases where there is a presence of T3/4 stage, high-grade tumors, and 5 or more metastatic lymph nodes in high-risk SGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.