Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992680›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Health and wellbeing of staff working at higher education institutions globally during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period: evidence from a cross-sectional study.

Muhammad Aziz Rahman, Pritimoy Das, Louisa Lam, Sheikh M Alif, Farhana Sultana, Masudus Salehin, Biswajit Banik, Bindu Joseph, Parul Parul, Andrew Lewis and 34 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of qualitative research exploring resilience in Academia.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors.

Muhammad Aziz RahmanInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia. ma.rahman@federation.edu.au.
Pritimoy DasInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Louisa LamSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sheikh M AlifInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Farhana SultanaTelstra Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Masudus SalehinInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Biswajit BanikInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Bindu JosephInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Parul ParulInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Andrew LewisInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Dixie StathamInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Joanne PorterCollaborative Evaluation and Research Centre (CERC), Federation University Australia, Churchill, Australia.
Kim FosterSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sheikh Mohammed Shariful IslamInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Wendy CrossInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.
Alycia JacobSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Susan HuaSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Qun WangSchool of Nursing, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Sek Ying ChairThe Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Wai Tong ChienThe Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Sri WidatiUniversitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ira NurmalaUniversitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Ni Nyoman Tri PuspaningsihUniversitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Majeda HammoudFaculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Khatijah OmarInstitute of Tropical Biodiversity & Sustainable Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Muhammad Abi Sofian Abdul HalimInstitute of Tropical Biodiversity & Sustainable Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Mohammed Gamal-EltrabilyDivisión de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad Anáhuac Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Georgina OrtizDivisión de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad Anáhuac Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Turkiya Saleh Al MaskariOman College of Health Sciences-South Sharquiya, South Sharquiya, Oman.
Salwa Saleh Mohammed Al AlawiOman College of Health Sciences-South Sharquiya, South Sharquiya, Oman.
Badriya Saleh Al-RahbiOman College of Health Sciences-South Sharquiya, South Sharquiya, Oman.
Judie ArulappanSultan Qaboos University, AlKhoudh, Oman.
Akhlaq AhmadUniversity of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Nahed Al LahamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Al Azhar University-Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine.
Ilias MahmudSchool of Health, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
Ibrahim AlasqahSchool of Health, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.
Habib NoorbhaiBEAHT Research Centre, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Shao-Liang ChangAsia University, Wufeng, Taiwan.
Yi-Lung ChenAsia University, Wufeng, Taiwan.
Mehmet Fatih ComlekciKirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey.
Oguz BasolKirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey.
Basema SaddikCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Rick HaymanNorthumbria University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Remco PolmanInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, 3806, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ongoing global crisis of Higher Education (HE) institutions during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period has increased the likelihood of enduring psychological stressors for staff. This study aimed to identify factors associated with job insecurity, burnout, psychological distress and coping amongst staff working at HE institutions globally.

methodsAn anonymous cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 with staff at HE institutions across 16 countries. Job insecurity was measured using the Job Insecurity Scale (JIS), burnout using the Perceived Burnout measure question, psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), and coping using the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Multivariable logistic regression with a stepwise variable selection method was used to identify associations.

resultsA total of 2,353 staff participated; the mean age (± SD) was 43(± 10) years and 61% were females. Most staff (85%) did not feel job insecurity, one-third (29%) perceived burnout in their jobs, more than two-thirds (73%) experienced moderate to very high levels of psychological distress, and more than half (58%) exhibited medium to high resilient coping. Perceived job insecurity was associated with staff working part-time [Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.53 (95% Confidence Intervals 1.15-2.02)], having an academic appointment [2.45 (1.78-3.27)], having multiple co-morbidities [1.86 (1.41-2.48)], perceived burnout [1.99 (1.54-2.56)] and moderate to very high level of psychological distress [1.68 (1.18-2.39)]. Perceived burnout was associated with being female [1.35 (1.12-1.63)], having multiple co-morbidities [1.53 (1.20-1.97)], perceived job insecurity [1.99 (1.55-2.57)], and moderate to very high levels of psychological distress [3.23 (2.42-4.30)]. Staff with multiple co-morbidities [1.46 (1.11-1.92)], mental health issues [2.73 (1.79-4.15)], perceived job insecurity [1.61 (1.13-2.30)], and perceived burnout [3.22 (2.41-4.31)] were associated with moderate to very high levels of psychological distress. Staff who perceived their mental health as good to excellent [3.36 (2.69-4.19)] were more likely to have medium to high resilient coping.

conclusionsFactors identified in this study should be considered in reviewing and updating current support strategies for staff at HE institutions across all countries to reduce stress and burnout and improve wellbeing.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalBurnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPsychological DistressSARS-CoV-2UniversitiesHealthJob insecurityMental healthResilient copingUniversity staff

Identifiers

PMID38992680
PMCPMC11238394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.