Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992658›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Hospital personnel perspectives on factors influencing acute care patient outcomes: a qualitative approach to model refinement.

Jessica Ziemek, Natalie Hoge, Kyla F Woodward, Emily Doerfler, Alison Bradywood, Alix Pletcher, Abraham D Flaxman, Sarah J Iribarren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica ZiemekSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Box 357260, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Natalie HogeSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Box 357260, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Kyla F WoodwardSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Box 357260, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. kylas@uw.edu.
Emily DoerflerSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Box 357260, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Alison BradywoodWashington Board of Nursing, PO Box 47864, Olympia, WA, 98504, USA.
Alix PletcherUniversity of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Box 351615, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Abraham D FlaxmanUniversity of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Box 351615, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Sarah J IribarrenSchool of Nursing, University of Washington, Box 357260, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems have long been interested in the best practices for staffing in the acute care setting. Studies on staffing often focus on registered nurses and nurse-to-patient staffing ratios. There were fewer studies on the relationship between interprofessional team members or contextual factors such as hospital and community characteristics and patient outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to refine an explanatory model by soliciting hospital personnel feedback on staffing and patient outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis to understand hospital personnel's perspectives and experiences of factors that affect acute care inpatient outcomes. Interviews were conducted in 2022 with 38 hospital personnel representing 19 hospitals across Washington state in the United States of America.

resultsFindings support a model of characteristics impacting patient outcomes to include the complex and interconnected relationships between community, hospital, patient, and staffing characteristics. Within the model, patient characteristics were positioned into hospital characteristics, and in turn these were positioned within community characteristics to highlight the importance of setting and context when evaluating outcomes. Together, these factors influenced both staff characteristics and patient outcomes, but these two categories also share a direct relationship.

conclusionFindings can be applied to hospitals and health systems in a variety of contexts to examine how external factors such as community resource availability impact care delivery. Future research should expand on this work with specific attention to how staffing changes and interprofessional team composition can improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Personnel Staffing and SchedulingQualitative ResearchAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersonnel, HospitalWashingtonCare modelsQualitativeRN staffingStaffingWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID38992658
PMCPMC11241948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.