Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992601›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

YOLO-V5 based deep learning approach for tooth detection and segmentation on pediatric panoramic radiographs in mixed dentition.

Busra Beser, Tugba Reis, Merve Nur Berber, Edanur Topaloglu, Esra Gungor, Münevver Coruh Kılıc, Sacide Duman, Özer Çelik, Alican Kuran, Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Busra BeserDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
Tugba ReisPedodontics, Private Practice, Trabzon, Turkey.
Merve Nur BerberDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
Edanur TopalogluDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Esra GungorDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Münevver Coruh KılıcDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Beykent University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sacide DumanDepartment of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Özer ÇelikDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Alican KuranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, İzmit, Kocaeli, 41190, Turkey. alican.kuran@outlook.com.
Ibrahim Sevki BayrakdarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn the interpretation of panoramic radiographs (PRs), the identification and numbering of teeth is an important part of the correct diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of YOLO-v5 in the automatic detection, segmentation, and numbering of deciduous and permanent teeth in mixed dentition pediatric patients based on PRs.

methodsA total of 3854 mixed pediatric patients PRs were labelled for deciduous and permanent teeth using the CranioCatch labeling program. The dataset was divided into three subsets: training (n = 3093, 80% of the total), validation (n = 387, 10% of the total) and test (n = 385, 10% of the total). An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm using YOLO-v5 models were developed.

resultsThe sensitivity, precision, F-1 score, and mean average precision-0.5 (mAP-0.5) values were 0.99, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.98 respectively, to teeth detection. The sensitivity, precision, F-1 score, and mAP-0.5 values were 0.98, 0.98, 0.98, and 0.98, respectively, to teeth segmentation.

conclusionsYOLO-v5 based models can have the potential to detect and enable the accurate segmentation of deciduous and permanent teeth using PRs of pediatric patients with mixed dentition.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDentition, MixedPediatric DentistryRadiography, PanoramicToothAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleArtificial intelligenceDeep learningPanoramic radiographsPediatric dentistryTooth enumeration

Identifiers

PMID38992601
PMCPMC11238494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.