Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992598›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024

Do-not-attempt-resuscitation decision making: physicians' recommendations differ from the GO-FAR score predictions.

David Olukolade Alao, Snaha Abraham, Emad Dababneh, Roxanne Roby, Mohammed Farid, Nada Mohammed, Natalia Rojas-Perilla, Arif Alper Cevik

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07243041 (A Prospective Study Exploring Factors Affecting ICU Transitions and Handling of Code Status - Insights Into Physician and Family Communication in a Muslim Patient Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07243041 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Study Exploring Factors Affecting ICU Transitions and Handling of Code Status - Insights Into Physician and Family Communication in a Muslim Patient Population

TypeobservationalSponsorKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled320ConditionsEnd of Life Care, Muslim, Decision Making ,Shared
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David Olukolade AlaoTawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE. davidalao@uaeu.ac.ae.
Snaha AbrahamTawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
Emad DababnehLife Support Center, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
Roxanne RobyTawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
Mohammed FaridTawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
Nada MohammedTawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
Natalia Rojas-PerillaStatistics Support Center, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE.
Arif Alper CevikTawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimIn-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a major cause of mortality globally, and over 50% of the survivors will require institutional care as a result of poor neurological outcome. It is important that physicians discuss the likely outcome of resuscitation with patients and families during end-of-life discussions to help them with decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We aim to compare three consultants' do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions with the GO-FAR score predictions of the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA).

methodsThis is a retrospective study of all patients 18 years or older placed on a DNR order by a consensus of three consultants in a tertiary institution in the United Arab Emirates over 12 months. Patients' socio-demographics and the GO-FAR variables were abstracted from the electronic medical records. We applied the GO-FAR score and the probability of survival with good neurological outcomes for each patient.

resultsA total of 788 patients received a DNR order, with a median age of 71 years and a majority being males and expatriates. The GO-FAR model categorized 441 (56%) of the patients as having a low or very low probability of survival and 347 (44%) as average or above. There were 219 patients with a primary diagnosis of cancer, of whom 148 (67.6%) were in the average and above-average probability groups. There were more In-hospital deaths among patients in the average and above-average probability of survival group compared with those with very low and low probability (243 (70%) versus 249 (56.5%) (P < 0.0001)). The DNR patients with an average or above average chance of survival by GO-FAR score were more likely to be expatriates, oncology patients, and did not have sepsis.

conclusionsThe GO-FAR score provides a guide for joint decision-making on the possible outcomes of CPR in the event of IHCA. The physicians' recommendation and the ultimate patient's resuscitation choice may differ due to more complex contextual medico-social factors.

Indexed as

DNRGO-FAR scoreIHCAPhysician decision-making

Identifiers

PMID38992598
PMCPMC11241957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.