ArticlePediatric surgery international2024
Surgical aspects of choledochal cyst in children and adults: an experience of 106 cases.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open excision of choledochal cyst in preschool-aged children: analysis from a nationally representative database.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for risk factors associated with conversion to open surgery in pediatric laparoscopic radical resection of choledochal cysts.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes in neonates and infants with congenital choledochal malformation: analysis of the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Type III choledochal cyst confirmed by aspiration and treated with endoscopic fenestration plus internal drainage: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe clinical features of choledochal cyst (CC) patients in terms of demographic data, clinical presentation, investigations, treatment, and outcomes among children and adults.
methodsThe medical records of patients undergoing choledochal cyst (CC) surgery from 2002 to 2021 at a university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: children (< 15 years) and adults (≥ 15 years). Descriptive statistics were used.
resultsThere were 106 cases of CC (Female/male = 88/18, children/adult = 53/53). Abdominal pain was the predominant presenting symptom, followed by jaundice in both groups. Adults were significantly more prone to present with abdominal pain compared to children (86.8% vs. 52.8%; p < 0.001), while children were more likely to experience acholic stool than adults (22.6% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.004). Ultrasound was the preferred investigation screening modality (75.5%). Most patients were presented with type I CC (71.7%). Laparoscopic-assisted approach was performed in 8.5%. CC excision with roux-en-y hepatico-jejunostomy was the main procedure (88.7%). Adults had a higher incidence of post-op complications, including stones, anastomosis stricture, abdominal collection, and cholangitis. Adults were significantly more likely to require intervention after surgery, compared to children (26.4% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.04).
conclusionsUltrasound was the most common screening tool for diagnosis. Postoperatively, adults with CC experience more serious post-op complications compared to children. This could be attributed to long-standing cystic inflammation. Therefore, prompt definitive surgery is recommended for CC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38992296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.