Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992251›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Comprehensive Systematic Review of Breast Implant Illness: Symptoms, Management, and Long-Term Outcomes.

Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim, Ibrahim Abdullah S Albalawi, Abdullah A Al Qurashi, Ibrahim R Halawani, Jumanah Y Nassar, Alanoud Hammam Asaad, Ghazlan Ali Alhenaki, Adnan M Osama Al Dwehji, Fareeda Nawaf Asaad Alsajan, Subhi M K Zino Alarki and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Breast implant rupture during coronary artery bypass grafting in a transgender woman.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abdulaziz AlabdulkarimPlastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Abdullah S AlbalawiCollege of Medicine, Tabuk University, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. ebrahimzzz43@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9141-7703
Abdullah A Al QurashiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences at the National Guards, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim R HalawaniFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Jumanah Y NassarMedicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Alanoud Hammam AsaadCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghazlan Ali AlhenakiFirst Health Cluster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Adnan M Osama Al DwehjiCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fareeda Nawaf Asaad AlsajanCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Subhi M K Zino AlarkiCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amani Jamaan BasaeedKing Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ubai Yousef A BaroumCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asim M AlbishryCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast augmentation using silicone implants is common, with over 300,000 annual US surgeries. It was initially approved in 1962, there were safety concerns with the use of silicone implants, leading to a 1992-2006 FDA moratorium. Recently, Breast Implant Illness (BII) was described as a cluster of symptoms associated with silicone implants, with a lack of diagnostic criteria, which increased the likelihood of implant removal and a variety of treatment options. This comprehensive review aims to shed light on the extent, symptoms, management, and outcomes of BII.

methodsMultiple electronic databases were systematically searched in May 2023 for studies on Breast Implant Illness utilizing terms related to BII and its symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment. Out of 1204 studies, 20 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the included cohort prospective and retrospective studies, and the tool for evaluating the methodological quality of case reports and case series were utilized during quality assessment.

resultsThere were 20 papers on Breast Implant Illness published between 1995 and 2022, including a peak of papers published in 2020 and 2022. The majority of the studies came from the USA, with a variety of research methods, including case reports. Reports of arthralgia and fatigue were common findings. These symptoms were frequently alleviated by surgical procedures such as en bloc explantation and capsulectomy, highlighting the intricacy of the problem and the need for individualized treatment plans.

conclusionThe review underscores the critical need for further research into BII, advocating for a multidisciplinary strategy that prioritizes patient safety, informed decision-making, and comprehensive care. As the medical community progresses in understanding and managing BII, emphasizing evidence-based practices and patient-provider communication will be essential in addressing this complex condition effectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsPostoperative ComplicationsSilicone GelsDevice RemovalFemaleHumansRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeSilicone GelsBreast implant diseaseBreast Implant IllnessManagementOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID38992251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.