SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2024
Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid in Combination with 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A shikonin-based hydrogel dressing exhibiting synergistic anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, and anti-fibrotic effects for the prevention of hypertrophic scars.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAddressing hypertrophic scars and keloids poses a significant challenge in the realm of preventive and curative medicine. Combination corticosteroid with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is presumed to enhance the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids, although supportive evidence is lacking. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety profile of a combined corticosteroid and 5-FU regimen in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted for pertinent studies across various databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Medline. The calculation of weighted mean difference (WMD), risk ratios (RR), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was executed. Additionally, the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was utilized to evaluate potential bias risks.
resultsA total of 15 studies were involved. The effectiveness based on patient self-assessment and the effectiveness based on observer assessment were significantly higher in the corticosteroid+5-FU group compared to those treated with control. A meta-analysis of scar height showed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group performed better than the control group (WMD = -0.38, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.18). There was no significant difference between the corticosteroid+5-FU group and the control group in improving scar vascularity, pliability and pigmentation. The result revealed that the corticosteroid+5-FU group of patients had less adverse effect of hypopigmentation, skin atrophy and telangiectasia than the control group.
conclusionThe combined use of corticosteroids and 5-FU appears to be a more effective strategy for the treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scars and keloids, as evidenced by greater improvements in scar height and overall effectiveness, coupled with a reduced incidence of side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
38992250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.