Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992245›Full record

Trial reportMolecular imaging and biology2024

A Phase 2 Multicenter Clinical Trial of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging of Lung Cancer with a pH-Activatable Nanoprobe.

Gregory T Kennedy, Feredun S Azari, Austin Chang, Patrick Bou-Samra, Charuhas Desphande, Jarrod Predina, Edward J Delikatny, Madeline Olson, David C Rice, Sunil Singhal

Abstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular imaging and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Translation of Intraoperative Molecular Imaging for Clinical Use.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Intraoperative fluorescence in solid head and neck cancer: A scoping review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gregory T KennedyDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard 14th Floor South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. gregory.kennedy@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5843-3998
Feredun S AzariDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard 14th Floor South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Austin ChangDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard 14th Floor South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Patrick Bou-SamraDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard 14th Floor South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Charuhas DesphandeDepartment of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jarrod PredinaDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard 14th Floor South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Edward J DelikatnyDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Madeline OlsonOncoNano Medicine, Inc, Southlake, TX, USA.
David C RiceDepartment of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sunil SinghalDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard 14th Floor South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

Shared Resource - Core A: Administrative CoreP01CA254859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Madduri S Srinivasarao · 2022 to 2026
$10.0M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health F32 CA254210-01Foundation for the National Institutes of Health P01CA254859NCI NIH HHS P01 CA254859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) uses tumor-targeted optical contrast agents to improve identification and clearance of cancer. Recently, a probe has been developed that only fluoresces when activated in an acidic pH, which is common to many malignancies. We report the first multicenter Phase 2 trial of a pH-activatable nanoprobe (pegsitacianine, ONM-100) for IMI of lung cancer.

methodsPatients with suspected or biopsy-confirmed lung cancer scheduled for sublobar resection were administered a single intravenous infusion of pegsitacianine (1 mg/kg) one to three days prior to surgery. Intraoperatively, the patients underwent a white light thoracoscopic evaluation, and then were imaged with an NIR thoracoscope to detect tumor fluorescence. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients with a clinically significant event (CSE) which was defined as an intraoperative discovery during IMI that led to a change in the surgical procedure. Possible CSEs included (i) localizing the index lung nodule that could not be located by white light, (ii) identifying a synchronous malignant lesion, or (iii) recognizing a close surgical margin (< = 10 mm). Secondary endpoints were sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of pegsitacianine in detecting tumor-containing tissue. The safety evaluation was based on adverse event reporting, clinical laboratory parameters, and physical examinations.

resultsTwenty patients were confirmed as eligible and administered pegsitacianine. Most of the patients were female (n = 12 [60%]), middle-aged (mean age 63.4 years), and former smokers (n = 13 [65%], 28.6 mean pack years). Mean lesion size was 1.9 cm, and most lesions (n = 17 [85%]) were malignant. The most common histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma (n = 9). By utilizing IMI with pegsitacianine, one patient had a CSE in the detection of a close margin and another had localization of a tumor not detectable by traditional surgical means. Six of 19 (31.6%) malignant lesions fluoresced with mean tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of 3.00, as compared to TBR of 1.20 for benign lesions (n = 3). Sensitivity and specificity of pegsitacianine-based IMI for detecting malignant tissue was 31.6% and 33.3%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of pegsitacianine-based IMI was 75% and 7.1%, respectively. Pegsitacianine-based imaging was not effective in differentiating benign and malignant lymph nodes. From a safety perspective, no drug-related serious adverse events occurred. Four patients experienced mild pegsitacianine-related infusion reactions which required discontinuing the study drug with complete resolution of symptoms.

conclusionsPegsitacianine-based IMI, though well tolerated from a safety perspective, does not consistently label lung tumors during resection and does not provide significant clinical benefit over existing standards of surgical care. The biology of lung tumors may not be as acidic as other solid tumors in the body thereby not activating the probe as predicted.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMolecular ImagingAgedFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiddle AgedActivatable probeIntraoperative molecular imagingLung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38992245
PMCPMC12424049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.