Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992200›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2024

The adjunctive use of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, light-emitting-diode photobiomodulation and ozone therapy in regenerative treatment of stage III/IV grade C periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Deniz Ozbay Cetiner, Sila Cagri Isler, Rahsan Ilikci-Sagkan, Janset Sengul, Ozlem Kaymaz, Ahu Uraz Corekci

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deniz Ozbay CetinerDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Biskek cad. 1. Sokak No:4, Emek Ankara, 06490, Turkey. fdeniz@gazi.edu.tr.
Sila Cagri IslerDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Biskek cad. 1. Sokak No:4, Emek Ankara, 06490, Turkey.
Rahsan Ilikci-SagkanDepartment of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, Uşak University, Uşak, 64300, Turkey.
Janset SengulPrivate Office, Memorial Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ozlem KaymazDepartment of Statistic, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahu Uraz CorekciDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Demokrasi University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the short-term efficacy of multiple sessions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT), light-emitting-diode (LED) photobiomodulation, and topical ozone therapy applications following surgical regenerative treatments on clinical parameters, patient-centered outcomes, and mRNA expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, RunX2, Nell-1, and osterix in gingival crevicular fluid samples in patients with stage III/IV, grade C periodontitis. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-eight systemically healthy patients were assigned into four groups to receive adjunctive modalities with regenerative periodontal surgical treatment. A 970 ± 15 nm diode laser plus indocyanine-green for aPDT group, a 626 nm LED for photobiomodulation group, and topical gaseous ozone were applied at 0, 1, 3, and 7 postoperative days and compared to control group. The clinical periodontal parameters, early wound healing index (EHI), and postoperative patients' morbidity were evaluated. The mRNA levels of biomarkers were assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

resultsNo significant difference in the clinical parameters except gingival recession (GR) was identified among the groups. For group-by-time interactions, plaque index (PI) and probing pocket depths (PD) showed significant differences (p = 0.034; p = 0.022). In sites with initial PD > 7 mm, significant differences were observed between control and photobiomodulation groups in PD (p = 0.011), between control and aPDT, and control and photobiomodulation groups in CAL at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.007; p = 0.022). The relative osterix mRNA levels showed a statistically significant difference among the treatment groups (p = 0.014).

conclusionsThe additional applications of aPDT and LED after regenerative treatment of stage III/IV grade C periodontitis exhibited a more pronounced beneficial effect on clinical outcomes in deep periodontal pockets.

Indexed as

Lasers, SemiconductorLow-Level Light TherapyOzonePhotochemotherapyAdultBiomarkersCombined Modality TherapyCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitFemaleGingival Crevicular FluidHumansIndocyanine GreenInterleukin-6MaleMiddle AgedPeriodontal IndexBiomarkersCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitIndocyanine GreenInterleukin-6OzonePhotosensitizing AgentsRUNX2 protein, humanSP7 protein, humanSp7 Transcription FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AGrade C periodontitisGuided tissue regenerationOzonePhotobiomodulation therapyPhotodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID38992200
PMCPMC11239751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.