Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992178›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhanced SOC estimation of lithium ion batteries with RealTime data using machine learning algorithms.

Obuli Pranav D, Preethem S Babu, Indragandhi V, Ashok B, Vedhanayaki S, Kavitha C

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Obuli Pranav DSchool of Electrical Engineering, VIT, Vellore, India.
Preethem S BabuSchool of Electrical Engineering, VIT, Vellore, India.
Indragandhi VSchool of Electrical Engineering, VIT, Vellore, India. indragandhi.v@vit.ac.in.
Ashok BSchool of Mechanical Engineering, VIT, Vellore, India. ashok.b@vit.ac.in.
Vedhanayaki SSchool of Electrical Engineering, VIT, Vellore, India.
Kavitha CDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sreenivasa Institute of Technology and Management Studies, Chittoor, India.

Funding

Royal Academy of Engineering (ATSP-2325-5-IN_172)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately estimating Battery State of Charge (SOC) is essential for safe and optimal electric vehicle operation. This paper presents a comparative assessment of multiple machine learning regression algorithms including Support Vector Machine, Neural Network, Ensemble Method, and Gaussian Process Regression for modelling the complex relationship between real-time driving data and battery SOC. The models are trained and tested on extensive field data collected from diverse drivers across varying conditions. Statistical performance metrics evaluate the SOC prediction accuracy on the test set. Gaussian process regression demonstrates superior precision surpassing the other techniques with the lowest errors. Case studies analyse model competence in mimicking actual battery charge/discharge characteristics responding to changing drivers, temperatures, and drive cycles. The research provides a reliable data-driven framework leveraging advanced analytics for precise real-time SOC monitoring to enhance battery management.

Indexed as

Comparative analysisElectric vehicleGaussian process regressionLithium-ion batteryMachine learningState of charge

Identifiers

PMID38992178
PMCPMC11239840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.