Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992177›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Progress, applications, and challenges in high-throughput effect-directed analysis for toxicity driver identification - is it time for HT-EDA?

Iker Alvarez-Mora, Katarzyna Arturi, Frederic Béen, Sebastian Buchinger, Abd El Rahman El Mais, Christine Gallampois, Meike Hahn, Juliane Hollender, Corine Houtman, Sarah Johann and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Iker Alvarez-MoraDepartment of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Leipzig, Germany. iker.alvarez-mora@ufz.de.
Katarzyna ArturiEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Frederic BéenKWR Water Research Institute, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Sebastian BuchingerDepartment of Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), Koblenz, Germany.
Abd El Rahman El MaisIneris, Parc Technologique Alata, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Christine GallampoisDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Meike HahnDepartment of Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG), Koblenz, Germany.
Juliane HollenderEawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Corine HoutmanChemistry for Environment and Health, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sarah JohannDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology and Environmental Toxicology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Martin KraussDepartment of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Marja LamoreeChemistry for Environment and Health, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maria MargalefChemistry for Environment and Health, Amsterdam Institute for Life and Environment (A-LIFE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Riccardo MasseiDepartment of Monitoring and Exploration Technologies, Research Data Management Team (RDM), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Werner BrackDepartment of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Melis MuzDepartment of Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid increase in the production and global use of chemicals and their mixtures has raised concerns about their potential impact on human and environmental health. With advances in analytical techniques, in particular, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), thousands of compounds and transformation products with potential adverse effects can now be detected in environmental samples. However, identifying and prioritizing the toxicity drivers among these compounds remain a significant challenge. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) emerged as an important tool to address this challenge, combining biotesting, sample fractionation, and chemical analysis to unravel toxicity drivers in complex mixtures. Traditional EDA workflows are labor-intensive and time-consuming, hindering large-scale applications. The concept of high-throughput (HT) EDA has recently gained traction as a means of accelerating these workflows. Key features of HT-EDA include the combination of microfractionation and downscaled bioassays, automation of sample preparation and biotesting, and efficient data processing workflows supported by novel computational tools. In addition to microplate-based fractionation, high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) offers an interesting alternative to HPLC in HT-EDA. This review provides an updated perspective on the state-of-the-art in HT-EDA, and novel methods/tools that can be incorporated into HT-EDA workflows. It also discusses recent studies on HT-EDA, HT bioassays, and computational prioritization tools, along with considerations regarding HPTLC. By identifying current gaps in HT-EDA and proposing new approaches to overcome them, this review aims to bring HT-EDA a step closer to monitoring applications.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysToxicity TestsAnimalsChromatography, Thin LayerEnvironmental PollutantsHumansMass SpectrometryEnvironmental PollutantsBioanalytical methodsHT-EDAMass spectrometryNTS

Identifiers

PMID38992177
PMCPMC11700053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.