Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992153›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2025

Beyond first impressions: the importance of seeing the whole person.

Meg Raby, Michele Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meg RabyKultureCity, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Michele KongThe University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. mkong@uabmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The power of a first impression and the trajectory it can set an individual on is something that impacts all people, and especially those with invisible disabilities. Societal norms and pragmatics are centered around neurotypical individuals and do not consider the perspective and neurology of the neurodivergent. What is the social norm for society can literally be impossible or physically uncomfortable for the neurodivergent, resulting in a mismatched doctor-patient relationship, an unintentionally inaccurate plan of care, or even a missed chance at a successful hire. We are presently in the neurodivergent movement where intentional inclusive practices are happening. First impressions coupled with curiosity and a better understanding of neurodivergence, could be the answer to a more positive relationship and outcome for all, no matter the situation or environment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Services for Persons with DisabilitiesPersons with DisabilitiesPhysician-Patient RelationsSocial NormsHumansNeurodevelopmental Disorders

Identifiers

PMID38992153
PMCPMC12014468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.