Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992152›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The effect of classical optimizers and Ansatz depth on QAOA performance in noisy devices.

Aidan Pellow-Jarman, Shane McFarthing, Ilya Sinayskiy, Daniel K Park, Anban Pillay, Francesco Petruccione

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aidan Pellow-JarmanQunova Computing Inc, Daejeon, 34051, South Korea.
Shane McFarthingQunova Computing Inc, Daejeon, 34051, South Korea.
Ilya SinayskiySchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4001, South Africa. sinayskiy@ukzn.ac.za.
Daniel K ParkDepartment of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Anban PillayCentre for Artificial Intelligence Research (CAIR), Cape Town, South Africa.
Francesco PetruccioneSchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4001, South Africa.

Funding

KIST Institutional Program 2E32241-23-010National Research Foundation of Korea 2022M3E4A1074591NICIS (National Integrated Cyber Infrastructure System) QICSI7Yonsei University Research Fund 2023-22-0072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a variational quantum algorithm for Near-term Intermediate-Scale Quantum computers (NISQ) providing approximate solutions for combinatorial optimization problems. The QAOA utilizes a quantum-classical loop, consisting of a quantum ansatz and a classical optimizer, to minimize some cost function, computed on the quantum device. This paper presents an investigation into the impact of realistic noise on the classical optimizer and the determination of optimal circuit depth for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in the presence of noise. We find that, while there is no significant difference in the performance of classical optimizers in a state vector simulation, the Adam and AMSGrad optimizers perform best in the presence of shot noise. Under the conditions of real noise, the SPSA optimizer, along with ADAM and AMSGrad, emerge as the top performers. The study also reveals that the quality of solutions to some 5 qubit minimum vertex cover problems increases for up to around six layers in the QAOA circuit, after which it begins to decline. This analysis shows that increasing the number of layers in the QAOA in an attempt to increase accuracy may not work well in a noisy device.

Identifiers

PMID38992152
PMCPMC11239845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.