ArticleCommunications biology2024
Identification and characterization of specific motifs in effector proteins of plant parasites using MOnSTER.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organoids: generation strategies, applications, and future challenges.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Genomic and Functional Analysis of Carbohydrate Esterases in the Maize PathogenMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Definition of the effector landscape across 13 phytoplasma proteomes with LEAPH and EffectorComb.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant pathogens cause billions of dollars of crop loss every year and are a major threat to global food security. Identifying and characterizing pathogens effectors is crucial towards their improved control. Because of their poor sequence conservation, effector identification is challenging, and current methods generate too many candidates without indication for prioritizing experimental studies. In most phyla, effectors contain specific sequence motifs which influence their localization and targets in the plant. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop bioinformatics tools tailored for pathogen effectors. To circumvent these limitations, we have developed MOnSTER a specific tool that identifies clusters of motifs of protein sequences (CLUMPs). MOnSTER can be fed with motifs identified by de novo tools or from databases such as Pfam and InterProScan. The advantage of MOnSTER is the reduction of motif redundancy by clustering them and associating a score. This score encompasses the physicochemical properties of AAs and the motif occurrences. We built up our method to identify discriminant CLUMPs in oomycetes effectors. Consequently, we applied MOnSTER on plant parasitic nematodes and identified six CLUMPs in about 60% of the known nematode candidate parasitism proteins. Furthermore, we found co-occurrences of CLUMPs with protein domains important for invasion and pathogenicity. The potentiality of this tool goes beyond the effector characterization and can be used to easily cluster motifs and calculate the CLUMP-score on any set of protein sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.