Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992081›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Morphological classification of neurons based on Sugeno fuzzy integration and multi-classifier fusion.

Fuyun He, Guanglian Li, Haixing Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fuyun HeSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, China. he_fuyun@gxnu.edu.cn.
Guanglian LiSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, China.
Haixing SongSchool of Electronic and Information Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, China.

Funding

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Brain-inspired Computing and Intelligent Chips No. BCIC-23-Z1Key Scientific Research Project of Guangxi Normal University No. 2018ZD007National Natural Science Foundation of China No.62062014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to extract more important morphological features of neuron images and achieve accurate classification of the neuron type, a method is proposed that uses Sugeno fuzzy integral integration of three optimized deep learning models, namely AlexNet, VGG11_bn, and ResNet-50. Firstly, using the pre-trained model of AlexNet and the output layer is fine-tuned to improve the model's performance. Secondly, in the VGG11_bn network, Global Average Pooling (GAP) is adopted to replace the traditional fully connected layer to reduce the number of parameters. Additionally, the generalization ability of the model is improved by transfer learning. Thirdly, the SE(squeeze and excitation) module is added to the ResNet-50 variant ResNeXt-50 to adjust the channel weight and capture the key information of the input data. The GELU activation function is used to better fit the data distribution. Finally, Sugeno fuzzy integral is used to fuse the output of each model to get the final classification result. The experimental results showed that on the Img_raw, Img_resample and Img_XYalign dataset, the accuracy of 4-category classification reached 98.04%, 91.75% and 93.13%, respectively, and the accuracy of 12-category classification reached 97.82%, 85.68% and 87.60%, respectively. The proposed method has good classification performance in the morphological classification of neurons.

Indexed as

Fuzzy LogicNeuronsAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38992081
PMCPMC11239936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.