Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38992072›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

Multimodal prehabilitation and postoperative outcomes in upper abdominal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Farshad Amirkhosravi, Kelvin C Allenson, Linda W Moore, Jacob M Kolman, Margaret Foster, Enshuo Hsu, Farzan Sasangohar, Atiya Dhala

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07700459 (A Randomised-controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Prehabilitation and a Structured Exercise Programme on Cardiorespiratory Performance in Adults Awaiting Elective Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07700459 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised-controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Prehabilitation and a Structured Exercise Programme on Cardiorespiratory Performance in Adults Awaiting Elective Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: The ACE-CHD Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRan2026 to 2029Enrolled32ConditionsCongenital Heart Disease, Cardiac SurgeryArmsExercise prehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prehabilitation and postoperative outcomes in colorectal surgery: an umbrella review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  9. Preoperative prehabilitation in adults: A concept analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Farshad AmirkhosraviDepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelvin C AllensonDepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Linda W MooreDepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Jacob M KolmanOffice of Faculty and Research Development, Department of Academic Affairs, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Margaret FosterSchool of Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Enshuo HsuCenter for Health Data Science and Analytics, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Farzan SasangoharWm Michael Barnes '64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Atiya DhalaDepartment of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA. afdhala@houstonmethodist.org.

Funding

Burroughs Wellcome Fund Burroughs Wellcome Fund Physician Scientist Institutional Award to the Texas A&M University Academy of Physician Scientists
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of multimodal prehabilitation on postoperative complications in upper abdominal surgeries is understudied. This review analyzes randomized trials on multimodal prehabilitation with patient and hospital outcomes. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for trials on prehabilitation before elective (non-emergency) abdominal surgery. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and all-cause complications; secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care length of stay. A meta-analysis with random-effect models was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated with I-square and Cochran's Q test. Dichotomous variables were reported in log-odds ratio and continuous variables were presented as mean difference. Ten studies (total 1503 patients) were included. Odds of developing complications after prehabilitation were significantly lower compared to various control groups (- 0.38 [- 0.75- - 0.004], P = 0.048). Five studies described PPCs, and participants with prehabilitation had decreased odds of PPC (- 0.96 [- 1.38- - 0.54], P < 0.001). Prehabilitation did not significantly reduce length of stay, unless exercise was implemented; with exercise, hospital stay decreased significantly (- 0.91 [- 1.67- - 0.14], P = 0.02). Multimodal prehabilitation may decrease complications in upper abdominal surgery, but not necessarily length of stay; research should address heterogeneity in the literature.

Indexed as

AbdomenLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative ExerciseHumansPreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38992072
PMCPMC11239889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.