Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38991891›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology oncology2024

The Role of Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen Value Prior to Age 60 in Predicting Lethal Prostate Cancer: Analysis of a Contemporary North American Cohort.

Marco Finati, Matthew Davis, Alex Stephens, Giuseppe Chiarelli, Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli, Chase Morrison, Rafe Affas, Akshay Sood, Nicolò Buffi, Giovanni Lughezzani and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marco FinatiVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Matthew DavisVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Alex StephensPublic Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Giuseppe ChiarelliVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Ottone CirulliVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA; Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Chase MorrisonVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Rafe AffasVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Akshay SoodDepartment of Urology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nicolò BuffiDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni LughezzaniDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Craig RogersVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA; Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Andrew Julian VickersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Firas AbdollahVUI Center for Outcomes Research, Analysis, and Evaluation, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA; Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: fabdoll1@hfhs.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JAMES A EASTHAM · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveStudies evaluating the role of baseline midlife prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a predictor of development and progression of prostate cancer relied predominately on cohorts from the pre-PSA screening introduction era. The aim of our study was to examine the role of baseline PSA prior to the age of 60 yr as a predictor of developing lethal prostate cancer using a contemporary North American cohort.

methodsOur cohort included all men aged 40-59 yr who received their first PSA through our health system between the years 1995 and 2019. Patients were divided into four categories based on age: 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and 55-59 yr. Baseline PSA was the predictor of interest. Lethal disease was defined as death from prostate cancer or development of metastatic disease either at diagnosis or during follow-up. Cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality were obtained by linking our database to the Michigan Vital Records registry. Competing-risk regression was used to evaluate the association between PSA and lethal prostate cancer. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 129067 men met the inclusion criteria during the study period. The median follow-up for patients free from cancer was 7.4 yr. For men aged 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, and 55-59 yr, the estimated rates of lethal prostate cancer at 20 yr were 0.02%, 0.14%, 0.33%, and 0.51% in men with PSA <median, and 0.79%, 0.16%, 2.5%, and 5.4% in men with PSA ≥90th percentile, respectively. For the same age category, the estimated rates of any prostate cancer at 20 yr were, respectively, 1.6%, 2.9%, 3.9%, and 5.8% in men with PSA <median, and 25%, 28%, 38%, and 39% in men with PSA ≥90th percentile. On a multivariable analysis, men with PSA ≥90th percentile had a hazard ratio of 7.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.20-9.03) for lethal disease, when compared with those with PSA <median. On the multivariable analysis, men with PSA ≥90th percentile had a hazard ratio of 20.47-fold (95% CI: 18.58-22.55) for prostate cancer incidence, when compared with those with PSA <median at first. Limitations included shorter median follow-up than prior literature. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Baseline PSA is a very strong predictor of the subsequent risk of developing lethal prostate cancer in a large contemporary diverse North American cohort, which was exposed to opportunistic PSA screening. The association was far larger than that found for polygenic risk scores, confirming that baseline PSA prior to the age of 60 yr is the most effective tool for adjusting subsequent screening. Compared with studies of unscreened cohorts, there was a smaller difference in discrimination between incident and lethal disease, reflecting the influence of screening. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we found that a single baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value is strongly predictive of the subsequent risk of developing metastatic prostate cancer, as well as the risk of dying from prostate cancer. The initial PSA level can therefore be used to adjust the frequency of subsequent PSA testing.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth AmericaPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenHealth care disparitiesMiddle agedMortalityProstate-specific antigenProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38991891
PMCPMC12935154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.