Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38991686›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Exploring medical first responders' perceptions of mass casualty incident scenario training: a qualitative study on learning conditions and recommendations for improvement.

Fredrik Schulz, Quynh Nguyen, Anke Baetzner, David Sjöberg, Lina Gyllencreutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. [Status quo of leading emergency physician deployment : A nationwide survey].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fredrik SchulzDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden fredrik.schulz@umu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-5125-7939
Quynh NguyenCenter for Technology Experience, Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Wien, Austria.
Anke BaetznerInstitute of Sports and Sports Sciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
David SjöbergUnit of Police Work, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.
Lina GyllencreutzDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1848-060X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite participating in scenario training, many medical first responders (MFRs) perceive themselves as inadequately prepared to respond to mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive examination of traditional MCI scenario training methods, focusing on their inherent strengths and limitations. An investigation into the perceptions of MFRs who had participated in MCI scenario training was carried out to identify potential areas for improvement and provide recommendations for refining MCI training protocols.

designQualitative inductive approach using semistructured interviews that took place between October 2021 and February 2022. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis.

settingMCI scenario training involving four organisations (three emergency medical services and one search-and-rescue organisation) tasked with responding to MCIs, collectively representing four European Union countries.

participants27 MFRs (17 emergency medical services personnel and 10 search-and-rescue volunteers) were recruited to participate in the study.

resultsTwo categories and seven associated subcategories (shown in parentheses) were identified as influencing the learning outcomes for MFRs: Training in a context mirroring real-world incidents (conducting incident scene risk assessment, realistic representation in casualties, incorporating scenario variety into the curriculum, interagency collaboration, role alignment when training incident site management) and use of a pedagogical framework (allowing for mistakes, the importance of post-training evaluation).

conclusionsThis study reaffirms the value of traditional MCI scenario training and identifies areas for enhancement, advocating for realistic scenarios, interagency collaboration, improved incident site management skills and thorough post-training evaluation. It suggests a shift in MCI training conceptualisation and delivery. The potential of virtual reality technologies as a valuable addition to training methods is explored, with a note on the need for further research to ascertain the long-term effectiveness of these technologies. However, the selection of a training method should consider programme goals, target population and resources.

Indexed as

Emergency RespondersMass Casualty IncidentsQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDisaster PlanningEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle Agedmedical education & trainingnursing carequalitative researchtrauma nursingvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID38991686
PMCPMC11243206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.