Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38991680›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Gender-sensitive community weight-loss programmes to address overweight and obesity in men: a scoping review.

Dieu Nguyen, Yutong Liu, Shane A Kavanagh, Daryll Archibald

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dieu NguyenDeakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia dieu.nguyen@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0134-4510
Yutong LiuDeakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Shane A KavanaghDeakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Daryll ArchibaldLa Trobe University, Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine how gender-sensitive community weight-loss programmes have been used to address overweight and obesity in men and to identify what can be learnt from this rapidly evolving field.

designScoping review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping review checklist for reporting. DATA SOURCES: A database search was conducted using EBSCOhost (Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Complete, Global Health, Health Source: Consumer Edition, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition and Medline Complete), Google, Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations platform and Scopus. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All weight-loss programmes using a gender-sensitive approach to address men's overweight and obesity in community settings. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Narrative synthesis was conducted based on the research questions and objectives. Primary outcomes include operationalisation, context and concept of the gender-sensitive approach. Information was reviewed and extracted to Microsoft Excel by two reviewers.

resultsA total of 40 studies (28 quantitative, eight mixed methods and four qualitative) were identified from 4617 records. Gender-sensitive approaches were undertaken in a range of settings and contexts including professional sports clubs (n=21), non-professional sporting clubs (n=16), workplace-based (n=2) and commercial organisation-based (n=1). The most common analysis approaches were evaluating the effect of the programmes (n=31) where positive impact was predominantly shown (eg, up to 3.9 kg weight reduction at 3-month follow-up). Programmes (ie, Football Fans in Training) were short-term cost-effective (eg, the cost was £862-£2228 per 5% weight reduction at 12-month follow-up). Qualitative evidence highlights factors that influenced men's participation (eg, camaraderie) and identifies areas for improvement.

conclusionThe findings demonstrate that gender-sensitive programmes for men's weight loss have been effectively applied using a range of different approaches and in a range of different contexts. Further evidence is needed to confirm the effectiveness of the programmes across diverse groups of men.

Indexed as

ObesityOverweightWeight Reduction ProgramsHumansMaleSex FactorsWeight Lossobesitysports medicinesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38991680
PMCPMC11243212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.