Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38991012›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Movement patterns of foraging common terns (Sterna hirundo) breeding in an urban environment in coastal Virginia.

Daniel H Catlin, Daniel Gibson, Kelsi L Hunt, Chelsea E Weithman, Ruth Boettcher, Rebecca Gwynn, Sarah M Karpanty, James D Fraser, Shannon Ritter, Sara M Maxwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel H CatlinDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4637-0384
Daniel GibsonDepartment of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Kelsi L HuntDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Chelsea E WeithmanDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Ruth BoettcherVirginia Department of Wildlife Resources, Henrico, VA, United States of America.
Rebecca GwynnVirginia Department of Wildlife Resources, Henrico, VA, United States of America.
Sarah M KarpantyDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
James D FraserDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Shannon RitterDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Sara M MaxwellBothell Campus, University of Washington, Bothell, WA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nesting colonial seabirds are prime examples of central-place foragers, animals that must return to a central location (e.g., a breeding colony) after each bout of foraging. They must balance the costs and benefits of foraging with the need to return to their colonies frequently to form pair bonds during courtship, incubate, provision mates and offspring, and protect and rear young. For some populations, the loss and degradation of suitable breeding habitat due to human activities have necessitated the construction of new breeding sites and/or the restoration of previously occupied sites. South Island, which is part of the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel (HRBT) complex in the Commonwealth of Virginia, U.S.A., is a human-created island that supported Virginia's largest mixed species seabird colony until 2020, when the expansion of the HRBT began and when all nesting seabirds were permanently excluded from the site. We studied the movement patterns of foraging common terns (Sterna hirundo) to determine how travel to and around foraging sites related to their colony location and to inform the siting and construction of a new breeding island. We tracked 18 individual common terns from 07 June to 29 June 2018, and we used a hidden Markov model to assign behavioral states and investigate common tern movements around the HRBT. Common terns spent more than half their time in the colony (58%), followed by time devoted to foraging (22%), and the remainder of their time was spent on outbound (15%) and inbound (5%) transit. Terns traveled as far as 98km from the colony, but on average foraged relatively close to South Island (13.6 ± 0.3km, mean ± 1 SD). Individuals tended to forage in the same locations, but there was variation among individuals. Flying to foraging sites uses energy during the already energetically costly breeding season, thus managers should prioritize placing a new colony site in a location that minimizes the distance traveled to the foraging locations frequented by the South Island birds while accounting for other life-history characteristics. These findings could help in the design and construction of new breeding sites or the restoration of current sites for other, related species, particularly for which these data do not exist.

Indexed as

CharadriiformesAnimal MigrationAnimalsBreedingEcosystemFeeding BehaviorFemaleMaleNesting BehaviorReproductionVirginia

Identifiers

PMID38991012
PMCPMC11238962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.