ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Integrating health across the Sustainable Development Goals in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Assessment of Voluntary National Reviews from 18 countries.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Catastrophic Health Expenditure among Iraqi Households: A Cross-Sectional Study.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Article
- Health expenditure, governance and SDG3 nexus: a longitudinal analysis in BRICS economies.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Correction: Integrating health across the Sustainable Development Goals in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: Assessment of Voluntary National Reviews from 18 countries.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Measuring progress on health and well-being in the Eastern Mediterranean Region via voluntary national reviews, 2016-2021: What does the data reveal?PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voluntary National Reviews are the formal mechanism for countries to report on progress and share lessons learned on SDG implementation. We assessed the Voluntary National Reviews submitted by countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region to note the reported progress on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) implementation, the review preparation process and how health is positioned and framed to identify priorities for accelerating progress on the health-related SDGs. We extracted quantitative and qualitative data from 26 Voluntary National Reviews from 18 countries submitted during the period 2016 to January 2022. We focused on three areas: SDG implementation, the review preparation process and the positioning of health in the reviews. Three assessors conducted the data extraction based on the agreed framework according to their language of expertise (Arabic, English and French). One assessor supervised the whole process for consistency. If there was a doubt in interpretation, it was discussed and agreed among the assessors. Countries have established a mechanism for SDG implementation under high-level leadership, engaged in multistakeholder consultations, aligned and mainstreamed SDGs to national plans, and created a monitoring and review mechanism. Countries reported use of national participatory approach for the report preparation. The prioritization of both health and well-being (SDG3) and economic growth (SDG8) in the reports is unique compared to other regional and global assessments. Health was often framed around disease and health care provision without linkages to societal inequities and structural challenges. The reports indicated good progress in SDG implementation. Addressing upstream issues and the determinants of health requires the health sector to take a more strategic approach in advocating for health and well-being. Further research is needed to demonstrate how to address synergies and trade-offs of policy choices and identify the co-benefits of addressing health in the context of fiscal instability and widening inequities in the region.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.