ArticlePloS one2024
Preclinical studies of RA475, a guanidine-substituted spirocyclic candidate RPN13/ADRM1 inhibitor for treatment of ovarian cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an urgent unmet need for more targeted and effective treatments for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The emergence of drug resistance is a particular challenge, but small molecule covalent inhibitors have promise for difficult targets and appear less prone to resistance. Michael acceptors are covalent inhibitors that form bonds with cysteines or other nucleophilic residues in the target protein. However, many are categorized as pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) and considered unsuitable as drugs due to their tendency to react non-specifically. Targeting RPN13/ADRM1-mediated substrate recognition and deubiquitination by the proteasome 19S Regulatory Particle (RP) is a promising treatment strategy. Early candidate RPN13 inhibitors (iRPN13) produced a toxic accumulation of very high molecular weight polyubiquitinated substrates, resulting in therapeutic activity in mice bearing liquid or solid tumor models, including ovarian cancer; however, they were not drug-like (PAINS) because of their central piperidone core. Up284 instead has a central spiro-carbon ring. We hypothesized that adding a guanidine moiety to the central ring nitrogen of Up284 would produce a compound, RA475, with improved drug-like properties and therapeutic activity in murine models of ovarian cancer. RA475 produced a rapid accumulation of high molecular polyubiquitinated proteins in cancer cell lines associated with apoptosis, similar to Up284 although it was 3-fold less cytotoxic. RA475 competed binding of biotinylated Up284 to RPN13. RA475 shows improved solubility and distinct pharmacodynamic properties compared to Up284. Specifically, tetraubiquitin firefly luciferase expressed in leg muscle was stabilized in mice more effectively upon IP treatment with RA475 than with Up284. However, pharmacologic analysis showed that RA475 was more rapidly cleared from the circulation, and less orally available than Up284. RA475 shows reduced ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and in vitro inhibition of HERG. Treatment of mice with RA475 profoundly inhibited the intraperitoneal growth of the ID8-luciferase ovarian tumor model. Likewise, RA475 treatment of immunocompetent mice inhibited the growth of spontaneous genetically-engineered peritoneal tumor, as did weekly cisplatin dosing. The combination of RA475 and cisplatin significantly extended survival compared to individual treatments, consistent with synergistic cytotoxicity in vitro. In sum, RA475 is a promising candidate covalent RPN13i with potential utility for treatment of patients with advanced EOC in combination with cisplatin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.