Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38990849›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Intolerance of uncertainty does not significantly predict decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards: A failure to replicate Luhmann, C. C., Ishida, K., & Hajcak, G. (2011).

Pedro L Cobos, María J Quintero, Francisco J López, David Luque, Luis F Ciria, Y Joaquín Morís

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pedro L CobosUniversidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3752-0056
María J QuinteroUniversidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-4121
Francisco J LópezUniversidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3884-4025
David LuqueUniversidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Luis F CiriaMind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Y Joaquín MorísUniversidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-1577

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is thought to lead to maladaptive behaviours and dysfunctional decision making, both in the clinical and healthy population. The seminal study reported by Luhmann and collaborators in 2011 showed that IU was negatively associated with choosing a delayed, but more certain and valuable, reward over choosing an immediate, but less certain and valuable, reward. These findings have been widely disseminated across the field of personality and individual differences because of their relevance to understand the role of IU in maladaptive behaviours in anxiety-related disorders. We conducted a study to replicate and extend Luhmann et al.'s results with a sample of 313 participants, which exceeded the size necessary (N = 266) to largely improve the statistical power of the original study by using the small telescopes approach. The results of our well powered study strongly suggest that the relationship between IU and the tendency to prefer an immediate, but less certain and less valuable reward is virtually negligible. Consequently, although this relationship cannot be definitely discarded, we conclude that it cannot be detected with Luhmann et al.'s (2011) decision-making task.

Indexed as

Decision MakingRewardAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUncertaintyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38990849
PMCPMC11238987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.