Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38990523›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2024

Caregiver Experiences With an Internet-Delivered Insomnia Intervention: SHUTi-CARE Trial Primary Qualitative Analysis.

Kelly M Shaffer, Kate Perepezko, Jillian V Glazer, Meghan K Mattos, Julie Klinger, Daniel J Buysse, Lee M Ritterband, Heidi Donovan

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04986904 (Optimizing Efficiency and Impact of Digital Health Interventions for Caregivers), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04986904 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing Efficiency and Impact of Digital Health Interventions for Caregivers: A Mixed Methods Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled102ConditionsFamily Caregivers, Insomnia, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersArmsSHUTi (Sleep Healthy Using the Internet)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Caregivers' Internet-Delivered Insomnia Intervention Engagement and Benefit: SHUTi-CARE Trial Primary Quantitative Analysis.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Caregiver Mental Health Across Generations.Journal of family issues · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelly M ShafferCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9749-8006
Kate PerepezkoNational Center on Family Support, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3762-563X
Jillian V GlazerCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Meghan K MattosCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Julie KlingerNational Center on Family Support, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Daniel J BuysseSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lee M RitterbandCenter for Behavioral Health and Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Heidi DonovanNational Center on Family Support, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

Optimizing efficiency and impact of digital health interventions for caregivers: A mixed methods approachR21TR003522 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SHAFFER, KELLY MCLEAN · 2021 to 2022
$455k
National Institutes of Health (NIH)-National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences R21TR003522NCATS NIH HHS R21 TR003522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health interventions show potential to increase caregivers' access to psychosocial care; however, it is unclear to what extent existing interventions may need to be tailored to meet caregivers' unique needs. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether-and if so, how-an efficacious Internet-delivered insomnia program should be modified for caregivers. The generalizability of these findings beyond the tested program was also examined.

methodsHigher-intensity family caregivers (N = 100; age M = 52.82 [SD = 13.10], 75% non-Hispanic White, 66% ≥college degree) received access to an Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) program. Participants who completed one or more intervention "Cores" provided open-ended feedback on their experience; nonusers (completed no Cores) shared their barriers.

resultsMost caregivers who used the program (n = 82, 82%) found it feasible, citing its user-friendly, fully automated online format. Many reported that CBT-I strategies were helpful, although some faced challenges in implementing these strategies due to the unpredictability of their caregiving responsibilities. Opinions were divided on the utility of tailoring the program for caregivers. Nonusers (n = 18, 18%) primarily cited concerns about time burden and lifestyle compatibility as usage barriers.

conclusionsDelivering fully automated behavioral interventions through the Internet appears suitable for many caregivers. Extensive tailoring may not be required for most caregivers to benefit from an existing online CBT-I program, although additional guidance on integrating CBT-I strategies in the context of challenging sleep schedules and environments may help a subset of caregivers. Future research should explore how such tailoring may enhance digital health intervention uptake and effectiveness for caregivers.

Indexed as

CaregiversCognitive Behavioral TherapyInternet-Based InterventionQualitative ResearchSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdultAgedFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedCognitive-behavioral therapy for insomniaFamily caregiversInsomniaInternet interventionQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID38990523
PMCPMC11533202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.