ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
GAPS: a geometric attention-based network for peptide binding site identification by the transfer learning approach.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PEARL: novel protein targets recommendation model via heterogeneous graph representation learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Deciphering microbial biofilm: mechanism, infection, and advanced approaches for control.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Bioactive peptides targeting dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis: from computational discovery and data bottlenecks to precision medicine translation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-peptide interactions (PPepIs) are vital to understanding cellular functions, which can facilitate the design of novel drugs. As an essential component in forming a PPepI, protein-peptide binding sites are the basis for understanding the mechanisms involved in PPepIs. Therefore, accurately identifying protein-peptide binding sites becomes a critical task. The traditional experimental methods for researching these binding sites are labor-intensive and time-consuming, and some computational tools have been invented to supplement it. However, these computational tools have limitations in generality or accuracy due to the need for ligand information, complex feature construction, or their reliance on modeling based on amino acid residues. To deal with the drawbacks of these computational algorithms, we describe a geometric attention-based network for peptide binding site identification (GAPS) in this work. The proposed model utilizes geometric feature engineering to construct atom representations and incorporates multiple attention mechanisms to update relevant biological features. In addition, the transfer learning strategy is implemented for leveraging the protein-protein binding sites information to enhance the protein-peptide binding sites recognition capability, taking into account the common structure and biological bias between proteins and peptides. Consequently, GAPS demonstrates the state-of-the-art performance and excellent robustness in this task. Moreover, our model exhibits exceptional performance across several extended experiments including predicting the apo protein-peptide, protein-cyclic peptide and the AlphaFold-predicted protein-peptide binding sites. These results confirm that the GAPS model is a powerful, versatile, stable method suitable for diverse binding site predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.