Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38990507›Full record

ArticleMonash bioethics review2024

From super-wicked problems to more-than-human justice: new bioethical frameworks for antimicrobial resistance and climate emergency.

Tiia Sudenkaarne, Andrea Butcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Monash bioethics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tiia SudenkaarneDepartment of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. tiia.sudenkaarne@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6077-2406
Andrea ButcherDepartment of Sociology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5046-1110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, building on our multidisciplinary expertise on philosophy, anthropology, and social study of microbes, we discuss and analyze new approaches to justice that have emerged in thinking with more-than-human contexts: microbes, animals, environments and ecosystems. We situate our analysis in theory of and practical engagements with antimicrobial resistance and climate emergency that both can be considered super-wicked problems. In offering solutions to such problems, we discuss a more-than-human justice orientation, seeking to displace human exceptionalism while still engaging with human social justice issues. We offer anthropological narratives to highlight how more-than-human actors already play an important role in environmental and climate politics. These narratives further justify the need for new ethical frameworks, out of which we, for further development outside the scope of this article, suggest a queer feminist posthumanist one.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesClimate ChangeDrug Resistance, MicrobialSocial JusticeAnimalsHumansFeministMore-than-humanOne healthPosthumanQueerSocial study of microbesSuper-wicked problems

Identifiers

PMID38990507
PMCPMC11850483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.