Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38990411›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024

Pars interarticularis screws for posterior cervical fusion - investigating a new trajectory using a CT-based multiplanar reconstruction: Part I.

Sara Lener, Christoph Wipplinger, Anto Abramovic, Heiko Koller, Claudius Thomé, Michael Verius, Sebastian Hartmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara LenerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medial University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. sara.lener@i-med.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-2399
Christoph WipplingerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medial University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Anto AbramovicDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medial University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Heiko KollerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Claudius ThoméDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medial University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael VeriusDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sebastian HartmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medial University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLateral mass screw fixation is the standard for posterior cervical fusion between C3 and C6. Traditional trajectories stabilize but carry risks, including nerve root and vertebral artery injuries. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is gaining popularity, but trajectories present anatomical challenges. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study proposes a novel pars interarticularis screw trajectory to address these issues and enhance in-line instrumentation with cervical pedicle screws. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of reformatted cervical CT scans included 10 patients. Measurements of the pars interarticularis morphology were performed on 80 segments (C3-C6). Two pars interarticularis screw trajectories were evaluated: Trajectory A (upper outer quadrant entry, horizontal trajectory) and Trajectory B (lower outer quadrant entry, cranially pointed trajectory). These were compared to standard lateral mass and cervical pedicle screw trajectories, assessing screw lengths, angles, and potential risks to the spinal canal and transverse foramen.

resultsTrajectory B showed significantly longer pars lengths (15.69 ± 0.65 mm) compared to Trajectory A (12.51 ± 0.24 mm; p < 0.01). Lateral mass screw lengths were comparable to pars interarticularis screw lengths using Trajectory B. Both trajectories provided safe angular ranges, minimizing the risk to delicate structures. DISCUSSION: and Conclusion. Pars interarticularis screws offer a viable alternative to lateral mass screws for posterior cervical fusion, especially in MISS contexts. Trajectory B, in particular, presents a feasible and safe alternative, reducing the risk of vertebral artery and spinal cord injury. Preoperative assessment and intraoperative technologies are essential for successful implementation. Biomechanical validation is needed before clinical application.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeSpinal FusionTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedBone ScrewsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPedicle ScrewsRetrospective StudiesDorsal cervical fusionDorsal cervical stabilizationIsthmusNovel trajectoryPars interarticularis

Identifiers

PMID38990411
PMCPMC11239730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.