ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Simultaneous grading diagnosis of liver fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis using multimodal quantitative ultrasound and artificial intelligence framework.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noninvasive, accurate, and simultaneous grading of liver fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis is valuable for reversing the progression and improving the prognosis quality of chronic liver diseases (CLDs). In this study, we established an artificial intelligence framework for simultaneous grading diagnosis of these three pathological types through fusing multimodal tissue characterization parameters dug by quantitative ultrasound methods derived from ultrasound radiofrequency signals, B-mode images, shear wave elastography images, and clinical ultrasound systems, using the liver biopsy results as the classification criteria. One hundred forty-two patients diagnosed with CLD were enrolled in this study. The results show that for the classification of fibrosis grade ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4, the highest AUCs were respectively 0.69, 0.82, 0.84, and 0.88 with single clinical indicator alone, and were 0.81, 0.83, 0.89, and 0.91 with the proposed method. For the classification of inflammation grade ≥ A2 and A3, the highest AUCs were respectively 0.66 and 0.76 with single clinical indicator alone and were 0.80 and 0.93 with the proposed method. For the classification of steatosis grade ≥ S1 and ≥ S2, the highest AUCs were respectively 0.71 and 0.90 with single clinical indicator alone and were 0.75 and 0.92 with the proposed method. The proposed method can effectively improve the grading diagnosis performance compared with the present clinical indicators and has potential applications for noninvasive, accurate, and simultaneous diagnosis of CLDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38990410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.