Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38990325›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

CT radiomics combined with clinical and radiological factors predict hematoma expansion in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.

Fei Yu, Mingguang Yang, Cheng He, Yanli Yang, Ying Peng, Hua Yang, Hong Lu, Heng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fei YuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Medical Imaging in Guizhou Higher Education Institutions, Zunyi, China.
Mingguang YangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Medical Imaging in Guizhou Higher Education Institutions, Zunyi, China.
Cheng HeDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Yanli YangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Medical Imaging in Guizhou Higher Education Institutions, Zunyi, China.
Ying PengDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Medical Imaging in Guizhou Higher Education Institutions, Zunyi, China.
Hua YangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Hong LuDepartment of Radiology, The Seventh People's Hospital of Chongqing, The Central Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China.
Heng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Medical Imaging in Guizhou Higher Education Institutions, Zunyi, China. zmcliuh@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-5154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to establish a hematoma expansion (HE) prediction model for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) patients by combining CT radiomics, clinical information, and conventional imaging signs.

methodsA retrospective continuous collection of HICH patients from three medical centers was divided into a training set (n = 555), a validation set (n = 239), and a test set (n = 77). Extract radiomics features from baseline CT plain scan images and combine them with clinical information and conventional imaging signs to construct radiomics models, clinical imaging sign models, and hybrid models, respectively. The models will be evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), clinical decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

resultsIn the training, validation, and testing sets, the radiomics model predicts an AUC of HE of 0.885, 0.827, and 0.894, respectively, while the clinical imaging sign model predicts an AUC of HE of 0.759, 0.725, and 0.765, respectively. Glasgow coma scale score at admission, first CT hematoma volume, irregular hematoma shape, and radiomics score were used to construct a hybrid model, with AUCs of 0.901, 0.838, and 0.917, respectively. The DCA shows that the hybrid model had the highest net profit rate. Compared with the radiomics model and the clinical imaging sign model, the hybrid model showed an increase in NRI and IDI.

conclusionThe hybrid model based on CT radiomics combined with clinical and radiological factors can effectively individualize the evaluation of the risk of HE in patients with HICH. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT radiomics combined with clinical information and conventional imaging signs can identify HICH patients with a high risk of HE and provide a basis for clinical-targeted treatment. KEY POINTS: HE is an important prognostic factor in patients with HICH. The hybrid model predicted HE with training, validation, and test AUCs of 0.901, 0.838, and 0.917, respectively. This model provides a tool for a personalized clinical assessment of early HE risk.

Indexed as

HematomaIntracranial Hemorrhage, HypertensiveTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesHematoma expansionHypertensive intracerebral hemorrhageMachine learningPrediction modelRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38990325
PMCPMC11632042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.