ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon : Diagnostics, treatment and aftercare].
Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With up to 50 incidents per 100,000 inhabitants, Achilles tendon ruptures are among the most frequent tendon injuries encountered in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Apart from high-risk forms of sport, degenerative processes are primarily responsible for weakening and ultimately rupture. In addition to assessing the typical clinical signs with inability to perform powerful plantar flexion, the diagnostics include easy to earn examination techniques, such as the Thompson test and ultrasound as the imaging gold standard. Conservative and surgical treatment are available depending on the constitution, age and requirements of the patient. The latter option is divided into conventional open, minimally invasive or percutaneous procedures. Good to very good results can be expected regardless of the form of treatment, provided that early functional rehabilitation is carried out. The average rerupture rate is 5% and the return to sport rate is around 80%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38990312What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.