ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Differences in Systemic Pulse Waveform Between Individuals With Glaucoma, Glaucoma Suspects, and Healthy Controls.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extravascular Motion Signal Detected by OCT Angiography Indicates Altered Vascular-Tissue Biomechanical Interactions in Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- ePWV as a scalable risk factor for large-scale glaucoma screening: evidence from a national Chinese cohort.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: It has been hypothesized that compromised ocular circulation in glaucoma may be concomitant of systemic changes. The purpose of this study is to test whether systemic blood flow pulse waveform patterns differ between individuals with glaucoma (GL), glaucoma suspects (GLS), and normal healthy controls (HC). Methods: The study included 35 bilateral GL, 67 bilateral GLS, 29 individuals with unilateral GL who were considered GLS in the other eye, and 44 healthy controls. Systemic pulsatile blood pressure waveforms were recorded using a finger cuff. A continuous 200 Hz plethysmography recording is made to obtain a pulse waveform. Waveform parameters were extracted using custom software from an average of eight pulse cycles. These were compared between GL, GLS, and HC groups on a per-eye basis, using generalized estimating equation models to account for intereye correlations; and plotted against disease severity by visual field linearized mean deviation (MDlin) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT). Results: Averaged blood pressure was significantly lower in the HC group (mean ± standard deviation 91.7 ±11.7 mm Hg) than the GLS (102.4 ± 13.9) or GL (102.8 ± 13.7) groups, with P < 0.0001 (generalized estimating equation regression). Waveform parameters representing vascular resistance were higher in both GLS and GL groups than the HC group; and were correlated with RNFLT and MDlin (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: The shape of the systemic pulsatile waveform differs in individuals with GL/GLS suspects, compared to HC eyes. Blood pressure changes more rapidly in individuals with GL, which suggests higher arterial stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.