ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024
Rapid, Accurate, Ranking of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities with VM2, the Second-Generation Mining Minima Method.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Quantum-Mechanical and Standard Single-Structure Protein-Ligand Scoring Functions with MD-Based Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies with a Quantum Mechanics-Based Mining Minima Algorithm.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Review
- Accurate protein-ligand binding free energy estimation using QM/MM on multi-conformers predicted from classical mining minima.Communications chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The structure-based technologies most widely used to rank the affinities of candidate small molecule drugs for proteins range from faster but less reliable docking methods to slower but more accurate explicit solvent free energy methods. In recent years, we have advanced another technology, which is called mining minima because it "mines" out the main contributions to the chemical potentials of the free and bound molecular species by identifying and characterizing their main local energy minima. The present study provides systematic benchmarks of the accuracy and computational speed of mining minima, as implemented in the VeraChem Mining Minima Generation 2 (VM2) code, across two well-regarded protein-ligand benchmark data sets, for which there are already benchmark data for docking, free energy, and other computational methods. A core result is that VM2's accuracy approaches that of explicit solvent free energy methods at a far lower computational cost. In finer-grained analyses, we also examine the influence of various run settings, such as the treatment of crystallographic water molecules, on the accuracy, and define the costs in time and dollars of representative runs on Amazon Web Services (AWS) compute instances with various CPU and GPU combinations. We also use the benchmark data to determine the importance of VM2's correction from generalized Born to finite-difference Poisson-Boltzmann results for each energy well and find that this correction affords a remarkably consistent improvement in accuracy at a modest computational cost. The present results establish VM2 as a distinctive technology for early-stage drug discovery, which provides a strong combination of efficiency and predictivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.