Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38989643›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2024

Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.

Petr Hollý, Tereza Hubená, Martin Čihák, Aneta Pavlíková, David Kemlink, Olga Ulmanová, Jan Rusz, Robert Jech, Radim Krupička, Evžen Růžička

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Petr HollýDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-8725
Tereza HubenáDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Martin ČihákDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Aneta PavlíkováDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.
David KemlinkDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Olga UlmanováDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan RuszDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1036-3054
Robert JechDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-8947
Radim KrupičkaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.
Evžen RůžičkaDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Charles University, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4893-9661

Funding

Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 580218National Institute for Neurological Research, Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5107Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze MH CZ-DRO-VFN64165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear.

objectiveThe aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET).

methodsForty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R

resultsTETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R

conclusionsTETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.

Indexed as

AccelerometryActivities of Daily LivingEssential TremorAgedAged, 80 and overDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness Indexaccelerometryactivities of daily livingessential tremorspiral drawingTETRASwater pouring

Identifiers

PMID38989643
PMCPMC11647970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.