Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38989618›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Brain state dynamics differ between eyes open and eyes closed rest.

Brandon T Ingram, Stephen D Mayhew, Andrew P Bagshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brandon T IngramCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-9245
Stephen D MayhewInstitute of Health and Neurodevelopment, School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1240-1488
Andrew P BagshawCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6217-1292

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M01116X/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/I022325/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/J002909/1University of Birmingham
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain exhibits spatio-temporally complex activity even in the absence of external stimuli, cycling through recurring patterns of activity known as brain states. Thus far, brain state analysis has primarily been restricted to unimodal neuroimaging data sets, resulting in a limited definition of state and a poor understanding of the spatial and temporal relationships between states identified from different modalities. Here, we applied hidden Markov model (HMM) to concurrent electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) resting-state data, training models on the EEG and fMRI data separately, and evaluated the models' ability to distinguish dynamics between the two rest conditions. Additionally, we employed a general linear model approach to identify the BOLD correlates of the EEG-defined states to investigate whether the fMRI data could be used to improve the spatial definition of the EEG states. Finally, we performed a sliding window-based analysis on the state time courses to identify slower changes in the temporal dynamics, and then correlated these time courses across modalities. We found that both models could identify expected changes during EC rest compared to EO rest, with the fMRI model identifying changes in the activity and functional connectivity of visual and attention resting-state networks, while the EEG model correctly identified the canonical increase in alpha upon eye closure. In addition, by using the fMRI data, it was possible to infer the spatial properties of the EEG states, resulting in BOLD correlation maps resembling canonical alpha-BOLD correlations. Finally, the sliding window analysis revealed unique fractional occupancy dynamics for states from both models, with a selection of states showing strong temporal correlations across modalities. Overall, this study highlights the efficacy of using HMMs for brain state analysis, confirms that multimodal data can be used to provide more in-depth definitions of state and demonstrates that states defined across different modalities show similar temporal dynamics.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingRestAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsYoung AdultEEG‐fMRIeyes closedeyes openhidden Markov modelresting‐state

Identifiers

PMID38989618
PMCPMC11237880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.