ArticleNanoscale advances2024
A comparative study of moisture adsorption on GO, MOF-5, and GO/MOF-5 composite for applications in atmospheric water harvesting.
Article in Nanoscale advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of ciprofloxacin removal from aqueous solutions using the TiOScientific reports · 2026Article
- Removal of chromium from textile wastewater using corncob-derived activated carbon in an industrial case study at MAA garment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influence of nickel doping on the moisture adsorption properties of magnesium aluminate spinel: thermodynamic and kinetic analysis.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Hierarchically MOF-Based Porous Monolith Composites for Atmospheric Water Harvesting.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Sustainable pretreatment and adsorption of chemical oxygen demand from car wash wastewater using Noug sawdust activated carbon.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Performance of maize tassel activated carbon for COD removal from industrial wastewater under optimized conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Eco-friendly solutions: a comprehensive review of natural coagulants for sustainable water treatment.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2025Review
- Sustainable coagulative removal of microplastic from aquatic systems: recent progress and outlook.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Process and mechanism modeling of cefotaxime removal from hospital wastewater using pistachio shells based magnetic activated carbon nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water scarcity is an alarming situation across the globe. Several methods have been reported in the literature to minimize the water shortage problem. Sorbent-based atmospheric water harvesting (SBAWH) is considered an energy-efficient, low-cost strategy, and sustainable approach. In the present study, the synthesis of graphene oxide (GO) was carried out using a modified Hummers' method, while the synthesis of MOF-5 and a GO/MOF-5 composite was carried out using a solvothermal approach. The synthesized materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The phase composition and crystallinity of all synthesized samples were confirmed by XRD analysis. SEM analysis provided information about the surface morphology of all synthesized samples. The adsorption of water vapors on surfaces of GO, MOF-5, and the GO/MOF-5 composite was evaluated by FTIR analysis. The negative charge was explored by the PZC technique on the surface of all synthesized materials. The water adsorption characteristics of GO, MOF-5, and the GO/MOF-5 composite were evaluated using an atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) plant. The maximum adsorption capacity of 542 mg g
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.