Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38989480›Full record

ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2024

CO

F Faris, A El-Houfi, M El Shahat, H Khalid, A Al-Azab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Changes in COJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Central Venous-arterial Carbon Dioxide Difference (pCOIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

F FarisCritical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
A El-HoufiCritical Care Medicine Department, Dubai Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, United Arab Emirates.
M El ShahatCritical Care Medicine Department, Shebin El-Kom Teaching Hospital, Egypt.
H KhalidCritical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
A Al-AzabCritical Care Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The difference in partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO Objectives: To investigate the value of ∆PCO Methods: This observational prospective study included 76 patients diagnosed with septic shock admitted to Cairo University Hospital's Critical Care Department between December 2020 and March 2022. Patients were categorised by initial resuscitation response, initial ∆PCO Results: Peri-resuscitation ∆PCO Conclusion: Peri-resuscitation ∆PCO Contribution of the study: The current study provides an insight to the PCO

Indexed as

arterial bloodcentral venous bloodCO2 gapgap rationon-invasive bedside markersPCO2∆PCO2 gapPeri-resuscitationseptic shock resuscitationtissue perfusion

Identifiers

PMID38989480
PMCPMC11232564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.