ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Identification and validation of Cystatin A as a novel promising therapeutic target for gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thioredoxin regulates T cell proliferation and aggravates the severity of influenza a virus infection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Potential biomarkers in early detection of gastric cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The effect of pharmacological treatment of gastric cancer (GC) is limited, thus, it holds significant scientific importance to thoroughly investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying GC development and identify novel molecules capable of substantially extending patients' survival. This study utilized bioinformatics techniques to identify 11 genes associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in GC patients and investigated the potential biological functions of these genes through single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Subsequently, a single gene Cystatin A (CSTA) was selected for further analysis to explore its impact on signaling pathways and treatment. Methods: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and overlapped in the analysis of RFS to identify potential prognostic genes for GC patients, based on data from the Cancer Genome Atlas-stomach adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD) and GSE54129. Subsequently, a prognostic model based on RFS in GC patients was established. Single-cell sequencing data were employed to explore the potential functions of these model genes. CSTA, one of the RFS-related genes, was further investigated using immunohistochemistry (IHC), Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK-8), transwell, scratch, colony formation assays, flow cytometry, and Western blotting methods. Results: Through bioinformatics analysis, we identified 23 RFS-related genes in GC. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox method, an RFS prognostic model was developed which pinpointed 11 GC prognosis-related (GPR) genes as significant factors influencing RFS in GC patients. The single-cell analysis revealed their potential role in affecting differentiation and maturation of pre-fibroblasts thereby impacting RFS in GC patients. CSTA exhibited low expression levels in GC tissues. Overexpression of CSTA promoted apoptosis in GC cells through the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway and enhanced their response to cisplatin via this same pathway. Conclusions: The 11 GPR genes are primarily enriched within a specific type of stromal cell exhibiting heightened communication, metabolism, and differentiation levels. The gene signature of these stromal cells has implications for patient prognosis. Additionally, CSTA, a gene related to prognosis, has been shown to influence apoptosis levels in GC cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.